Document Actions
Bike Blogging
Up one levelDocument Actions
New Feature: Friday Bike Trail Blogging
- Category(s)
- Austin
- Livability
- Bike Blogging
- Photos
Friday (Well, Saturday...) Bike Trail Blogging Week #2
- Category(s)
- Austin
- Livability
- Bike Blogging
- Photos
Saturday Bike Trail Blogging Week #3
- Category(s)
- Austin
- Livability
- Bike Blogging
- Photos
To That Anonymous Butt-Slappin' Girl on West Ave...
- Category(s)
- Austin
- Bike Blogging
Re:To That Anonymous Butt-Slappin' Girl on West Ave...
I thought lane-splitting was illegal in Texas.
Re:To That Anonymous Butt-Slappin' Girl on West Ave...
Yep, it is... But what I didn't mention in the post was that I had already been waiting near 5 minutes in traffic the way you're supposed to and, to be honest, I was getting physically tired of trackstanding the bike. I always stop for lights and stop signs and ride my bike just like I drive a car but, and I know it's not an excuse, these people in front just weren't moving and those of us behind missed 2 light cycles when I decided to go around. Everyone in line was getting frustrated and I think most people, in a similar position, would have done the same. Hell, I've seen people on motorcycles and scooters do worse things.
So does that excuse the action? Absolutely not. But would most reasonable people do the same? I'd argue most of them wouldn't have even waited through one light cycle much less sit out in traffic behind the cars. I take great care to project an image of what a cyclist should be doing (and I have been known to call out others for breaking those rules) so I deserve to be called out on this. Thanks for the comment...
Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections
"There have been no accidents here since February 2004. In the period between 1998 and 2002, when it was still an intersection with traffic lights, signs and lanes, 8 accidents were registered, 5 of which involved injuries (4 minor and 1 serious)."The reason why it's safer is that traveling in your car becomes a shared social experience instead of the "I'm-alone-in-my-own-world, get the f-out of my way" experience that we currently encourage through road design. Drivers must now make eye contact with pedestrians and cyclists as they have as much right to use the space as the drivers of the cars. This results in an unspoken "social contract" which has the effect of reducing the speed of the cars which enhances safety. Also, as a side benefit, since there are no signs to confuse drivers or stop lights (there is really only one rule: pedestrians and cyclists get right-of-way), the driving experience is less stressful while traffic still flows. Plus, livability can be enhanced designing around this concept. One example is pictured above: a water fountain that responds to the amount of traffic flowing through the intersection. The more cars that travel through it, the higher the fountain shoots water to "drown out" the sound from the passing traffic (the story actually showed some kids playing in the fountain. When was the last time you would allow your kids to "play in traffic?" :) The fountain serves both a functional as well as aesthetic function in the intersection. This plan can also contribute financially over the long-term as there is no need for traffic light installation (I couldn't find a Texas-referencing study but I found one estimate from Missouri that says it averages $250,000 for a standard installation) plus ongoing maintenance, electricity, signs, street marking etc. And as GritforBreakfast's post brings up the possibility of "countdown timers" for lights to further add confusion to these intersections, maybe a sea change approach to this problem is needed. Now, am I advocating that we need to rip out all the traffic lights in Austin and replace them with roundabouts? Certainly not. But if the council is "exploring" the idea of privacy-encroaching red-light cameras and if they are truly doing it in the name of safety, then they should also pilot other ways to achieve that goal that may work better and cost less. I can think of a few places in town that would be good for a pilot. One of those, Barton Springs Road between Lamar and Zilker Park, would be a good area for a pilot. I've mentioned in a previous post my concerns about a planned 250 unit luxury condominium complex going up in that area. If council decides to move forward on that, I wouldn't mind seeing a redesigning of the entire area following the Shared Space philosophy as that would "replace" what I feel those towers would be taking away from that area (a sense of community). I also think there are a few intersections downtown (around the 2nd and Guadalupe area where all the new condo construction is going on and where council is encouraging pedestrian amenities) that could also benefit from this approach. After all, I think the Shared Space concept aligns well with what most Austinites think about their city and would be another way for Austin to distinguish itself from other cities, maintaining that unique Austin brand that the new Design Standards are attempting to create. Now, I would've thought that somebody, somewhere would have proposed this idea to the council (and somebody must have) but a thorough search using Google and Technorati at the Statesman, Council archives and blogs produced no documented mentions (I guess it could be called something else...). I know we are a more progressive lot here in Austin so somebody must have brought this up already. I seem to remember when the area I mentioned before, Barton Springs, was up for it's "redesign" (actually, I know it was an attempt to alleviate the severe flooding problems of that stretch of the road and not a cosmetic thing), there was some mention of the concept but I can't seem to find an article about it. But you know what they say about memory and getting older... So, if you're like me and think this idea is worth exploring, let's let the council hear about it. I really think these proposed red-light cameras are a travesty and huge mistake-in-the-waiting, so let's try and re-think the problem instead of "bolting on" another one. Some resources:
- Category(s)
- Opinion
- Local Government
- Austin
- Livability
- Bike Blogging
- Development
Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections
Austin never feels safer than when there's a big storm that knocks out all the traffic signals. Courtesy automatically returns and all parties behave safely. It's also safer at many intersections for pedestrians to cross in the middle of the block (the right-turn thing is very dangerous for people on foot).
Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections
I posted such on Chronic: but the Urban Transportation Comm. has discussed some like radical options--but has no hope of our not-so-radical council listening. Why should we learn from the Europeans...they've only been designing civil solutions for a couple 1000 years?
No really...if we cared about safety-we'd at LEAST have implemented longer yellow light times, like 30 years ago.
Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections
Well, I'm glad to see people have brought this subject up in the past. I swear I thought I was nuts as I couldn't find a reference anywhere. But it makes sense for it to be brought up in the Urban Transportation Committee. Thanks for the info...
I also agree with you about the European attitude. They don't worship the car as much as we do here or extend the "proximity rights" to their SUV-sized hunks of metal quite like us Texans. I would love to see at least some of our intersections turned "friendlier" as I'm a regular bicycle commuter and I'll put it this way... I rode for almost 5 years, 6 days a week in the heart of Dallas traffic (Turtle Creek <-> Richardson on Preston Rd.) and only once came close to being hit by a car. In the 4 years I've been commuting here (only doing it 3-5 times a week), I've been hit twice (both by SUV at the same intersection; Red River and Cesar Chavez) and almost hit 3 other times at other intersections (2 of those at Barton Springs and Robert E Lee). Each of those times I was crossing with the light and got smacked (or almost smacked) by someone running the light well after it changed. And it's not like I spend a whole lot of time on the road (my route stays mostly on bike paths and trails).
I don't know what's in the water here in Austin but it just seems like people don't drive well down here and if you're a cyclist or pedestrian, get the f*** out of the way. So it seems like a good move to me to extend the *only* traffic rule in some intersections to be "pedestrians and cyclists have right of way... End of story." Thanks for reading and leaving the informative comment!
Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections
You are not too late to weigh in on the conversation. The council voted to use the light for a 60 to 90 day time period and then evaluate the effectiveness.
So, there will be a trial period and then some changes to the system before complete installation.


Well, it's not a Austin blogger post without a gratuitous Dallas slam... BTW, I'm sitting in my office in downtown Dallas after commuting by bike from my home (8 miles) on the Dallas MUTs (I've never, ever, heard them called 'nature trails').
Hehe, well, I lived in Dallas for 17 years and did *a lot* of bicycle commuting / riding back in the early to mid 90's (for the most part, I rode from Turtle Creek / McKinney Ave <-> Coit and Arapaho 6 days a week for nearly 5 years). I was nothing but a roadie at the time, looking down on those poor schmucks who were mountain biking (that's one thing I really didn't like about Dallas; too much emphasis on "what you had" and not on "how you rode," but that might have changed since then (I've been in Austin for the last 11yrs but it's even pretty clique-ish here)). At the time, I was averaging nearly 200 miles a week in commuting / training (I was living the dream of qualifying for the Atlanta games in '96... :) and most of that on the busy Dallas streets (primarily Oak Lawn / Preston) and the training was primarily with the guys from Richardson Bike Mart and a few times with the Chili's pro team around White Rock and out on the northern Plano roads.
I really didn't ride mountain bikes back then and I would agree with you that they really aren't "nature trails" but they were some of the few "trails" that were separated from traffic which made it safer for the cyclists. I'm not slamming Dallas; just comparing what I saw there to what is available down here. There are some truly great trails here in "downtown" Austin and even better trails scattered throughout the city and outlying areas.
Currently, here in Austin, there's been a lot of debate about how we Austinites would like our city to develop with the crushing growth that has been happening. A lot of us would like to keep the greenspaces and trails as we feel that they are a defining characteristic of this city. Otherwise, Austin really does run the risk of becoming a city much like Dallas or Houston (car friendly and a lot of sprawl). If a Starbuck's drive-thru at a strip mall is my cup of tea, I would certainly move to Plano/Dallas as it's already there. I don't need Austin to follow that path. That's not what I love about this city. In fact, it's the relative lack of those "amenities" that I like (but don't get me wrong; there's a Starbuck's about 2 miles from where I sit typing this... Next to a pool hall of all places... :)
And take heart in knowing this isn't your typical Austin blogger Dallas slam. I've got 17 years of experience to base it on! Thanks for leaving your comment!