Personal tools
You are here: Home Scott's Blog Categories Bike Blogging
Log in


Forgot your password?
 

Bike Blogging

Up one level

New Feature: Friday Bike Trail Blogging

Waller Creek

Well, I figured I'd try a new thing on the blog and try to add something regular so I came up with Friday Bike Trail Blogging. Every Friday, I'll post some pictures of some of the more untraveled and hidden places on the various Austin bike trails that I'm privileged to commute to work on.

My aim is to try and show some of the reasons why some of us love this city. The greenbelt trail system seems to be pretty overlooked by most who live here as it requires people to actually get out of their cars and walk out in the heat a bit. Compared to Dallas where, for the most part, the "nature trail" system downtown is basically White Rock Lake and the associated paved "trails," Austin's greenbelt is truly a rarity in urban, downtown areas. There are some really great nature areas on the trail system but I figured I would start with one of the smaller and possibly, most overlooked and maligned areas on the trail. It's a tiny bit of nature dead-smack in the middle of downtown Austin and one that I've seen quite a bit of wildlife running around.

Since I mentioned this area in my previous post, I figured the kickoff entry would be this quick look north up Waller Creek just under the 8th Street Bridge (right next to the Stubb's outdoor stage). Sorry that I only took this one snap but I was running late getting out of work and I had other places to get to (you can see my parking garage in the upper right of the photo) but in the next installment, I'll take some more detailed and (hopefully) artistic photos. This is a nice little area for assorted wildlife as I've seen both Great Blue Herons as well as, I think, their white morphs hanging out in the small pool fishing for the various shad above the small breakwater as well as turtles and various snakes. This area is just downstream from the old Reddy Ice brownsite that is now the new home of the Red River Flats development. For those that have read some of my development screeds, you'll know that I'm a big fan of the Red River Flats development as it seems to be the only "worker affordable" development being built downtown (with rents starting at $1400/mo). This is also part of the area that some on the City Council (Brewster McCracken and his ilk) are wanting to teardown and put in an Austin clone of San Antonio's Riverwalk (do these guys have any original ideas or do they only talk to Trammell Crow?).

Anyway, next week I'll have some more photos from a different area on the bike trail.

Re:New Feature: Friday Bike Trail Blogging

Posted by Anonymous User at Jul 24, 2006 10:14 AM

Well, it's not a Austin blogger post without a gratuitous Dallas slam... BTW, I'm sitting in my office in downtown Dallas after commuting by bike from my home (8 miles) on the Dallas MUTs (I've never, ever, heard them called 'nature trails').

Re:New Feature: Friday Bike Trail Blogging

Posted by paleo at Jul 24, 2006 09:51 PM

Hehe, well, I lived in Dallas for 17 years and did *a lot* of bicycle commuting / riding back in the early to mid 90's (for the most part, I rode from Turtle Creek / McKinney Ave <-> Coit and Arapaho 6 days a week for nearly 5 years). I was nothing but a roadie at the time, looking down on those poor schmucks who were mountain biking (that's one thing I really didn't like about Dallas; too much emphasis on "what you had" and not on "how you rode," but that might have changed since then (I've been in Austin for the last 11yrs but it's even pretty clique-ish here)). At the time, I was averaging nearly 200 miles a week in commuting / training (I was living the dream of qualifying for the Atlanta games in '96... :) and most of that on the busy Dallas streets (primarily Oak Lawn / Preston) and the training was primarily with the guys from Richardson Bike Mart and a few times with the Chili's pro team around White Rock and out on the northern Plano roads.

I really didn't ride mountain bikes back then and I would agree with you that they really aren't "nature trails" but they were some of the few "trails" that were separated from traffic which made it safer for the cyclists. I'm not slamming Dallas; just comparing what I saw there to what is available down here. There are some truly great trails here in "downtown" Austin and even better trails scattered throughout the city and outlying areas.

Currently, here in Austin, there's been a lot of debate about how we Austinites would like our city to develop with the crushing growth that has been happening. A lot of us would like to keep the greenspaces and trails as we feel that they are a defining characteristic of this city. Otherwise, Austin really does run the risk of becoming a city much like Dallas or Houston (car friendly and a lot of sprawl). If a Starbuck's drive-thru at a strip mall is my cup of tea, I would certainly move to Plano/Dallas as it's already there. I don't need Austin to follow that path. That's not what I love about this city. In fact, it's the relative lack of those "amenities" that I like (but don't get me wrong; there's a Starbuck's about 2 miles from where I sit typing this... Next to a pool hall of all places... :)

And take heart in knowing this isn't your typical Austin blogger Dallas slam. I've got 17 years of experience to base it on! Thanks for leaving your comment!

Friday (Well, Saturday...) Bike Trail Blogging Week #2

Waller Heron #2
Pease Park singletrack #1
Bull Creek #10

Photo album from this week is located here.

Well, I apologize that I didn't have a chance to do a "position" blog entry this week or get this up on time. It's been a long couple of weeks personally but things seem to be getting back to normal so I had some time to take a few snaps of a couple more of my favorite places on some of Austin's bike trails. Unfortunately, part of the problems of the last few weeks has been an intermittent Road Runner connection and so while the connection is up, I'm working on the blog. I guess I could always go to some coffee shop somewhere...

Anyhoo, the first picture is a follow-up from last week's post. On Friday morning, there was one of the Great Blue Herons hanging out in the area that I took a photo of last week (most of the Herons I've seen seem to hang out in this one little area and just north next to the Waller Creek building). This guy started out in the creek but when I tried to move in to get a closer shot, he flew up into the tree. I guess it would help to have a decent camera with a good telephoto lens (this camera is just a barebones 2Mpixel Kodak).

This week, I decided to highlight 2 areas: a small single-track trail in the middle of Pease Park and a bend of Bull Creek directly underneath MoPac.

These next few shots are the single-track trail that runs next to the main trail through Pease park. These shots are facing north and Lamar is about 1000ft to the right of the pictures. The camera really doesn't do the grade of the trail much justice but when the trail is wet, the limestone "boulders" become quite slick and can be a bit of a challenge going up (somebody recently blocked off the left side of the trail where it was a bit more challenging). There's a frisbee golf hole just south of where this trail pops out.

The rest of the photos are from Bull Creek directly under the MoPac bridges. From the satellite map, this area looks pretty small an unimpressive but it's quite pretty and serene once you get underneath the roadways. From the bottom of the creek to the roadway, it's probably about 80 or so feet. When you're driving on MoPac, it really just doesn't seem like you're that high up but it's a fair distance down. This part of the trail has a few pedestrian bridges that cross roughly at 5th and 1st streets. Again, this camera really doesn't show the scale of the surrounding hills and how straight up they seem to go. There's a few limestone outcrops that would be ok for some bouldering.

Sorry for the lateness of the post. Hopefully, we'll have the Internet connection figured out and back to normal for an on-time post next week.

Saturday Bike Trail Blogging Week #3

Upper Barton Creek #3
Upper Barton Creek #10
Upper Barton Creek #18

This week's photo album is located here

Well, I've decided to change the Friday feature to Saturday as it's now been 2 straight weeks that I haven't been able to leave work, take pictures, upload and annotate and then put the blog entry out. I didn't get out of work last night until 7:30pm or so and add the 35 minute bike ride and pictures, I didn't get home until almost 9pm. But I still took some pictures of another not-as-used area on the trail system so I hope they still give you a feeling what the trails are like.

This week I highlighted part of the Barton Creek Greenbelt but one that isn't used as much as some of the other areas. It's kinda separated from the rest of the trail system as it has a point of crossing across Barton Creek but usually, there's water in the creek so you have to get wet to get on that side if you come from the main BCG trail. The only other "official" entrance is off Homedale Dr. just behind Barton Creek Elementary (there are a few other trailheads on St. Mark's Church property). From the "official" trailhead, it goes up quite steeply over some loose limestone rocks and it can be a fair challenge getting started up the trail. The trail actually splits right behind the trail signs, one going west the other going north. If you head down the north trail, you will eventually wind up at Barton Creek (I highlighted that part of the trail in pictures 15 - 25). Yesterday, though, I went west to try and catch a few pictures of the setting Sun so I hit the parts of the trail that might offer a view first.

Overall, I would rate these trails as good for novices but there are some tricky (and fun) areas. You can pretty much cover the whole upper trail system in 30 mins to an hour (It's pretty small but there's some nice native scrub areas in it) and if you cross the creek to the main BCG trail, you could easily go all day.

To That Anonymous Butt-Slappin' Girl on West Ave...

Umm, Hello?

You know, I had tonight's blog entry all planned out from early today. I had a crappy day at work, I was going to comment on some of the things I saw on the way to work today (specifically tips for drivers and cyclists) and my ride home just didn't get any easier than going in. And then this most wonderful of all things happen...

There I was, trackstanding my mountain bike heading north on West Ave. between Frank & Angie's and Molotov's and behind a nice little Audi TT. Traffic was a bit backed up (about 6 cars which is quite a lot for that block) and it looked like everyone was turning left on 6th so I decided to go down the right side of the street and bypass the line. Unfortunately, the light on 6th went red so I pulled in between a rather large SUV and that same Audi TT to trackstand my way through another light. Little did I know that a devious plan was being launched from behind. Literally...

After about a minute of trackstanding, I was startled to hear a voice talking to me in between beats of "With You" by The Subways and I'm sure she saw that surprise through my consternated countenance. Now, it's quite amazing how much you can remember about an incident when something takes you by surprise. It's kinda like I remember exactly what the clouds looked like while I was doing a front flip over the front wheel of my crashing motorcycle about 15 years ago. Sure, we see clouds every day but I still remember those puffy white clouds framed by the black rim of the full face helmet before the blue and white sky turned to grayish-black asphalt. But this time wasn't about crashing motorcycles but about getting your butt slapped by a total stranger (not that those experiences are even comparable... :-)

I remember that she was wearing light blue jeans, a dark loose shirt with a silver necklace and blonde, shoulder length hair. I only had a second to turn and face her since I was still trackstanding. "Hi. My friend in the car said she would pay me 10 dollars if I came out here and slapped you on the butt. Would you mind?" Well, I think that's what she said. As I mentioned, The Subways were still rockin' in my ears. so in reality, I heard, "Hi. ... friend ... car ... 10 dollars ... slap you on the butt. ... mind?" Being quite well versed in selective hearing (I think all us guys are good at that), I was able to piece enough together to say "Sure. Whatever I can do to help." Which then, to be quite honest, she rather wimpily slapped the side of my right cheek and said "Thanks!" and went back to the car where I could see her friend with a blended look of "I can't believe she just did that..." and "Man, now I owe her 10 dollars..."

Now, on the rest of my way home, I was trying to attach some larger, cosmic meaning to this random event. After all, you don't get your butt slapped everyday by a complete and gorgeous stranger and especially wearing geeky cycling clothes (if anything, you take more insults from the guys for wearing those geek clothes. Just ask my co-workers...). I really wanted to say in this post that things like this are just what makes Austin, well... Austin. That irreverent attitude. What you see is what you get. You know, those kind of things. But after much thought and contemplation, it came down to there really wasn't a grand, underlying theme to the event. It was just some happy-go-lucky person doing something on a whim to a totally random person. Thankfully, this happy-go-lucky person likes to slap butts and isn't a serial killer, or worse, someone who likes to push those geeky cyclists over balancing at the stop light (Oh, come on... You know when you see us sitting there you're rooting for us to hit the deck... :-) That's just downright embarrassing.

The other thing I thought on the way home was I might get a bit upset if the butt slap was some kind of pity slap. You know, they felt sorry for the poor, geeky cyclist so let's show 'im some love. But even then, I'm hoping that the 10 years of on-and-off competitive cycling in Dallas sometimes averaging 250+ miles a week along with the 45-60 miles of mountain biking I regularly do here in Austin per week, might have had something to do with it. After all, we do need to tell ourselves these little things when the reality could be so much different.

So, to the anonymous girl who slapped my butt on West Ave. tonight, I thank you from the bottom of, well, you know... If your friend is still up for giving you money, I'm at that intersection every Mon, Wed and Fri at about that same time. Feel free to increase your bank account at my expense. Thanks for really making my day!

Changed: 12/30/06 - Changed the link from the generic Subways site (where you have to choose either UK or US version) to the US site (but make sure to check out their UK site as well.)

Re:To That Anonymous Butt-Slappin' Girl on West Ave...

Posted by Anonymous User at Dec 21, 2006 11:02 AM

I thought lane-splitting was illegal in Texas.

Re:To That Anonymous Butt-Slappin' Girl on West Ave...

Posted by paleo at Dec 21, 2006 11:39 AM

Yep, it is... But what I didn't mention in the post was that I had already been waiting near 5 minutes in traffic the way you're supposed to and, to be honest, I was getting physically tired of trackstanding the bike. I always stop for lights and stop signs and ride my bike just like I drive a car but, and I know it's not an excuse, these people in front just weren't moving and those of us behind missed 2 light cycles when I decided to go around. Everyone in line was getting frustrated and I think most people, in a similar position, would have done the same. Hell, I've seen people on motorcycles and scooters do worse things.

So does that excuse the action? Absolutely not. But would most reasonable people do the same? I'd argue most of them wouldn't have even waited through one light cycle much less sit out in traffic behind the cars. I take great care to project an image of what a cyclist should be doing (and I have been known to call out others for breaking those rules) so I deserve to be called out on this. Thanks for the comment...

Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections

Before...

After...

Well, I know I'm stepping into this debate a bit late (as the council has already approved a pilot of this red-light camera system almost 2 months ago), but I guess that's what you get when you decide to take some time off from writing. The topics just pass you by...

Anyway, I fully agree with GritsforBreakfast's assessment that this program is not being put forward in the name of safety but as a way for the council to bring in some duckets without uttering the politically damaging words "raise taxes." So let's challenge the council on this bluff and try another pilot program that's all about safety and long-term money saving while piloting this other Big Brotherish system.

I caught this story on the Science Channel's "Beyond Tomorrow" (regretfully, not available online) where they covered one town's approach to traffic management and safety by doing something that seems quite counter to the overall goal. In order to make the intersections safer, they removed all the signs and signal lights, widened sidewalks and created common areas for cars, pedestrians and cyclists to share. The concept, called "Shared Space," de-emphasizes the role of the automobile in the overall design of the intersection, which now must "negotiate" with pedestrians and cyclists for the use of the same area. The story focused on one intersection in Drachten, NL where the Shared Space principles were put in place. Not only were transit times for drivers lowered (they replaced the lights with a roundabout in an intersection that services 20,000 cars daily) but safety increased:
"There have been no accidents here since February 2004. In the period between 1998 and 2002, when it was still an intersection with traffic lights, signs and lanes, 8 accidents were registered, 5 of which involved injuries (4 minor and 1 serious)."
The reason why it's safer is that traveling in your car becomes a shared social experience instead of the "I'm-alone-in-my-own-world, get the f-out of my way" experience that we currently encourage through road design. Drivers must now make eye contact with pedestrians and cyclists as they have as much right to use the space as the drivers of the cars. This results in an unspoken "social contract" which has the effect of reducing the speed of the cars which enhances safety. Also, as a side benefit, since there are no signs to confuse drivers or stop lights (there is really only one rule: pedestrians and cyclists get right-of-way), the driving experience is less stressful while traffic still flows.

Plus, livability can be enhanced designing around this concept. One example is pictured above: a water fountain that responds to the amount of traffic flowing through the intersection. The more cars that travel through it, the higher the fountain shoots water to "drown out" the sound from the passing traffic (the story actually showed some kids playing in the fountain. When was the last time you would allow your kids to "play in traffic?" :) The fountain serves both a functional as well as aesthetic function in the intersection.

This plan can also contribute financially over the long-term as there is no need for traffic light installation (I couldn't find a Texas-referencing study but I found one estimate from Missouri that says it averages $250,000 for a standard installation) plus ongoing maintenance, electricity, signs, street marking etc. And as GritforBreakfast's post brings up the possibility of "countdown timers" for lights to further add confusion to these intersections, maybe a sea change approach to this problem is needed.

Now, am I advocating that we need to rip out all the traffic lights in Austin and replace them with roundabouts? Certainly not. But if the council is "exploring" the idea of privacy-encroaching red-light cameras and if they are truly doing it in the name of safety, then they should also pilot other ways to achieve that goal that may work better and cost less.

I can think of a few places in town that would be good for a pilot. One of those, Barton Springs Road between Lamar and Zilker Park, would be a good area for a pilot. I've mentioned in a previous post my concerns about a planned 250 unit luxury condominium complex going up in that area. If council decides to move forward on that, I wouldn't mind seeing a redesigning of the entire area following the Shared Space philosophy as that would "replace" what I feel those towers would be taking away from that area (a sense of community). I also think there are a few intersections downtown (around the 2nd and Guadalupe area where all the new condo construction is going on and where council is encouraging pedestrian amenities) that could also benefit from this approach. After all, I think the Shared Space concept aligns well with what most Austinites think about their city and would be another way for Austin to distinguish itself from other cities, maintaining that unique Austin brand that the new Design Standards are attempting to create.

Now, I would've thought that somebody, somewhere would have proposed this idea to the council (and somebody must have) but a thorough search using Google and Technorati at the Statesman, Council archives and blogs produced no documented mentions (I guess it could be called something else...). I know we are a more progressive lot here in Austin so somebody must have brought this up already. I seem to remember when the area I mentioned before, Barton Springs, was up for it's "redesign" (actually, I know it was an attempt to alleviate the severe flooding problems of that stretch of the road and not a cosmetic thing), there was some mention of the concept but I can't seem to find an article about it. But you know what they say about memory and getting older...

So, if you're like me and think this idea is worth exploring, let's let the council hear about it. I really think these proposed red-light cameras are a travesty and huge mistake-in-the-waiting, so let's try and re-think the problem instead of "bolting on" another one.

Some resources:

Corrections: Cleaned up some language in one of the sentences to make a little more sense (added "plus ongoing" and "street" to the sentence containing the cost estimates for traffic lights.

Update: Wells Dunbar puts up a chilling statistic over at the Chronic. 64 people died on Austin's roads in 2006. I can guarantee, if 64 people died of bird flu, this city would be in full panic mode. Although I haven't been hit by a car this year (I was hit once each in 2003 and 2005) and being one of the unreported accidents, I can only imagine the total number of accidents and not just deaths. This is atrocious and something needs to be done.

Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections

Posted by Ardilla Chiflada at Jan 01, 2007 03:46 PM

Austin never feels safer than when there's a big storm that knocks out all the traffic signals. Courtesy automatically returns and all parties behave safely. It's also safer at many intersections for pedestrians to cross in the middle of the block (the right-turn thing is very dangerous for people on foot).

Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections

Posted by Deb at Jan 04, 2007 04:13 PM

I posted such on Chronic: but the Urban Transportation Comm. has discussed some like radical options--but has no hope of our not-so-radical council listening. Why should we learn from the Europeans...they've only been designing civil solutions for a couple 1000 years?

No really...if we cared about safety-we'd at LEAST have implemented longer yellow light times, like 30 years ago.

Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections

Posted by paleo at Jan 04, 2007 09:59 PM

Well, I'm glad to see people have brought this subject up in the past. I swear I thought I was nuts as I couldn't find a reference anywhere. But it makes sense for it to be brought up in the Urban Transportation Committee. Thanks for the info...

I also agree with you about the European attitude. They don't worship the car as much as we do here or extend the "proximity rights" to their SUV-sized hunks of metal quite like us Texans. I would love to see at least some of our intersections turned "friendlier" as I'm a regular bicycle commuter and I'll put it this way... I rode for almost 5 years, 6 days a week in the heart of Dallas traffic (Turtle Creek <-> Richardson on Preston Rd.) and only once came close to being hit by a car. In the 4 years I've been commuting here (only doing it 3-5 times a week), I've been hit twice (both by SUV at the same intersection; Red River and Cesar Chavez) and almost hit 3 other times at other intersections (2 of those at Barton Springs and Robert E Lee). Each of those times I was crossing with the light and got smacked (or almost smacked) by someone running the light well after it changed. And it's not like I spend a whole lot of time on the road (my route stays mostly on bike paths and trails).

I don't know what's in the water here in Austin but it just seems like people don't drive well down here and if you're a cyclist or pedestrian, get the f*** out of the way. So it seems like a good move to me to extend the *only* traffic rule in some intersections to be "pedestrians and cyclists have right of way... End of story." Thanks for reading and leaving the informative comment!

Re:Counterpoint to "Red-Light" Traffic Cameras: Naked Intersections

Posted by Anonymous User at Jan 16, 2007 10:05 AM

You are not too late to weigh in on the conversation. The council voted to use the light for a 60 to 90 day time period and then evaluate the effectiveness.

So, there will be a trial period and then some changes to the system before complete installation.

Do you think we should be pulling out of Iraq and if so, on what time schedule?

We should leave immediately.
We should leave in the next few months.
We should leave by the end of next year.
No, we should stay in Iraq with no timetable for leaving.

« November 2008 »
November
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930